FTHEREFsb
12/21/2006 4:30:52 PM
Hey guys, i thought i would get a jump start on this BIKE thing since im planning on getting a honda 600 for sure. Any of you have any advice on what the differences are between me getting an F4i or a 600rr?
What are the pros and cons of each, and what do you think its worth buying?
thanks for the help!
doncollins
12/22/2006 6:36:45 AM
F4i has more comfort. RR has a few extra race inspired parts and set up. If possible, you need to test sit them to see how they feel to you.
MgA_ODEN
12/22/2006 8:14:42 AM
Don , you should move this to the CBR 600F4i forum so it will get more hits
jjkukla
1/24/2007 10:11:47 AM
+1 on what ODEN said. This would be better off in the RR or F4i section(s).
FWIW: F4i is more comfortable, but they're both nice bikes. Can't go wrong either way... all rider pref.
Flip
1/24/2007 12:51:38 PM
Personally, i think the earlier F4i's (01-03) make great first bikes. You get the cool split seat styling, but they are easier to ride than the newer RR's. I was looking for a good used one as my second bike, but couldnt find one in my price range and settled on a '99 F4. Once you get comfortable on an F4i, the jump to a race inspired RR will be cake. The RR is certainly more aggressive in positioning.
abadfish
1/24/2007 1:12:43 PM
IMHO, neither one of those bikes is a good first bike. Many on this board will disagree with me but a 600 sportbike (regardless of year) is not a beginner's bike.
Tahoe SC
1/24/2007 1:20:22 PM
i agree with abad...then again great minds think alike...
but if i had a choice...i'd get whatever is cheaper.
Munson
1/24/2007 1:36:49 PM
quote:
ORIGINAL: abadfish
IMHO, neither one of those bikes is a good first bike. Many on this board will disagree with me but a 600 sportbike (regardless of year) is not a beginner's bike.
I agree in principle, but if you are going to get one, at least get an older, cheaper one so you won't feel as bad when you drop it.
Triax
1/24/2007 3:05:34 PM
these two are to close to really compare. If it comes down to these two get which ever is you like more. I personally started riding on a CBR600F3 and that seemed damn fast. F4i is a bike that isn't going to kill you on those long rides, very comfortable and sits you upright more than the RR. The RR is more of a race bike, lighter, better suspension and styling, but has a more aggressive riding position and a blank of wood for a seat.
vpsophmore
1/24/2007 3:28:17 PM
Flip
1/24/2007 3:33:42 PM
quote:
ORIGINAL: abadfish
IMHO, neither one of those bikes is a good first bike. Many on this board will disagree with me but a 600 sportbike (regardless of year) is not a beginner's bike.
I dont know... you can get in trouble on anything. A lady in my MSF class on a POS Nighthawk hit a curb and landed on her head/neck in such a way that we had to call an ambulance, and that was at 10 mph. Just being on two wheel alone is dangerous, so you may as well get a bike you can grow with. If you start on a Ninja 250/500 you'll want to sell it in a few months. The F4/F4i's are easier to learn on and control than the RR, that was the question.
millertime
1/24/2007 3:34:08 PM
I have owned both. The f4i is the better choice for a beginner. Just remember that you will not ride very many bikes like the f4i. When you jump to a more aggressive bike it is still a big change. The f4i is very easy to ride, but still has more than enough power to mess you up.