CBR Forum   Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Search   Member List   Timeslips   Contact   Sponsors   Register   Login  

Carb vs. Injected....

  Printable Version
CBR Forums >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 600F4 >> Carb vs. Injected.... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/10/2006 12:32:15 AM   
Flyin_F4


Posts: 26
Joined: 6/28/2006
Status: offline
So what's better? I have heard much about both, so again, I thought that I would send it to the experts... (you...)


Chime in let me know what you think...

Have a great day!

And I know, general question.........

~Brian
Post #: 1
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/11/2006 12:11:47 AM   
Trueblood22


Posts: 52
Joined: 2/2/2006
Status: offline
I really can't think of any ways that a carb is better.

(in reply to Flyin_F4)
Post #: 2
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/11/2006 1:41:48 AM   
fireplug


Posts: 169
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
I had a 2001 GSX-R that was injected and now I have a 99 F4 that is carbed. Although I do like my F4 alot, it is nothing compaired to the GSX-R. The fuel injection system starts right up every time, even in the cold, and it just feels more crisp. I think there is a slight delay when working with a carb.

(in reply to Flyin_F4)
Post #: 3
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/11/2006 2:01:31 AM   
Flyin_F4


Posts: 26
Joined: 6/28/2006
Status: offline
I have heard that, although from my experience, the sound from a carbed engine verses an injected one is vastly different, I do prefer the carbed sound.

But, performance is performance. If I want sound, I'll buy Bose.

:)

I think the injection is a better "user friendly" approach, but there are people that swear that you get a better response from the carbs.

There is that preception of the tuning as well, but i think that is pretty fail safe as far as honda goes...

Just my three cents.

~Brian

(in reply to fireplug)
Post #: 4
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/11/2006 10:34:04 AM   
Flip


Posts: 573
Joined: 1/18/2006
Status: offline
Flip's photo gallery
FI problems are hard to diagnose and are expensive to fix. The response time you get from a twist of the throttle carbs vs FI is unoticeable unless you are Rossi.

I like simple engines so i can do things myself, so i like carbs. I never have a problem starting up with the choke.

(in reply to Flyin_F4)
Post #: 5
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/11/2006 12:38:30 PM   
fireplug


Posts: 169
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
I will agree with Flip on I do like to having the ability to work on a carb motor myself (one of the reasons why I bought the F4). And true I will never know the true preformance difference between the two unless I am Rossi. Maybe it is the differences in the F4 and GSX-R as a whole, but I felt alot better Gixxer.

(in reply to Flip)
Post #: 6
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/14/2006 4:00:09 AM   
ddvs



Posts: 547
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Bay Area
Status: offline
ddvs's photo gallery
This is a CBR forum not a GSXR forum, I think your playing with fire. Also why would you bring up a COMPLETELY different bike, brand, and especially injected. The topic was injection versus carburated. Stay on topic

< Message edited by ddvs -- 7/14/2006 4:01:16 AM >

(in reply to fireplug)
Post #: 7
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/14/2006 6:11:10 PM   
Draven

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 5/3/2006
Status: offline
FI > Carb. Theres no reason to be using a carb anymore IMO. If I could have afforded it, I'd have a FI bike. : )

(in reply to ddvs)
Post #: 8
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/15/2006 3:36:45 PM   
ddvs



Posts: 547
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Bay Area
Status: offline
ddvs's photo gallery
If I could have afforded it I would have bought a McLaren F4, but I still prefer my carbo because it's easier to work on and cheaper to fix. Thats if you know how to and you got a torque wrench.

(in reply to Draven)
Post #: 9
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/15/2006 3:37:37 PM   
ddvs



Posts: 547
Joined: 5/16/2006
From: Bay Area
Status: offline
ddvs's photo gallery
BTW I thought Rossi rode 125 GP, not 600 class?

(in reply to ddvs)
Post #: 10
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/15/2006 6:38:16 PM   
Flip


Posts: 573
Joined: 1/18/2006
Status: offline
Flip's photo gallery
He rides MotoGP, he started in 125 like 10 years ago...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_Rossi


(in reply to ddvs)
Post #: 11
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 7/15/2006 7:21:47 PM   
Flyin_F4


Posts: 26
Joined: 6/28/2006
Status: offline
I do prefer the carb after riding both, the performance difference was small at best and at east there is the fact that I CAN work on carbs...

Also, I do prefer the sound that carbed makes in the throttle.

And, if the fuel injection is easier to start, then you need to adjust the carbs, both should fire with little coaching.

Just my 3 cents.

Have a great day!


~brian

(in reply to Flip)
Post #: 12
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 11/28/2006 3:37:43 PM   
frankmackie


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/16/2006
Status: offline
frankmackie's photo gallery
Carbs are definetly less responsive stock, and adjustment (re-jetting) isnt fun or cheap (if done by someone else). There is less throtle response and slightly less immediate HP. Carbs are more sensitive to weather conditions. Injection just seems to work better all of the time, however it is controlled by computer, so you may have an issue there but i doubt it. It is also easy to upgrade an injected bikes intake performance... buy a chip and plug it in.

i have a carb bike and it can be more tempermental in cold starts. however, it as an authentic feel/sound to it i really like.
in terms of nostalgia think of the old carbed cars like mustang/camero/charger vs. new cars of the same make (or even the rice rockets). -- the newer ones tend to work better but there is an element people just like about the old school technology

(this from someone who is having carb/fuel issues with my bike right now... suprised myself a little with this one)

(in reply to Flyin_F4)
Post #: 13
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 11/28/2006 8:35:47 PM   
CBRF4

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 7/5/2006
Status: offline
I never had no problems starting my cbr f4 carbs even when it rains or is hot even cold but to tell you the truth i live in Florida so i dont know if i would have a problem if i lived in new york that get way colder there but when it get cold here in FL i think my bike performs better. all i know is that there is no f4i fuel injected that can keep up with my f4 so i really think carbs are way better but again thats my personal opinion and i respect everybodys opinion.

_____________________________

yoshi slip on. dyno jet stage 1. ignition advancer. K&N air filter. vortex front -1 back +2, R&K sw ring chain

(in reply to frankmackie)
Post #: 14
RE: Carb vs. Injected.... - 12/24/2006 5:13:28 PM   
AlpineCBR600

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/10/2006
Status: offline
AlpineCBR600's photo gallery
 
I like carb.. The only real difference I'v noticed between the two are fuel injected is a quicker responce system.. but not by too much... i'll stick too carb as long as i can... I own a 93 CBR600 and i love every second I'm riding!

_____________________________

Truck 2003 Dodge Dakota Sport
Car 1997 Sunfire 2Door G.T
Bike 1993 HondaCBR600 F2
Mods:
- Flush Mount Clear Front Signals
- Fender Eliminator Kit
- Custom Black & Red Paint
- ProPit Shaded WindSheild
- Aftermarket CBR Bar Ends

(in reply to CBRF4)
Post #: 15
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
CBR >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 600F4
Jump to:

Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
voodoochyl7459
doncollins6282
tahoe sc5915
rrasco5747
tk954rr5366
pitsvtec5323
thex5301
d2vw14_205166
vp4940
chainstretch4835

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

CBR Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.