RE: best radar dectector for a bike?

CBR Forum Classifieds News Photo Gallery Search Member List Timeslips Contact Sponsors Register Login

RE: best radar dectector for a bike?

Printable Version

CBR Forum >> This 'n' That >> Product Reviews >> RE: best radar dectector for a bike?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: best radar dectector for a bike? - 1/28/2006 11:13:31 PM

Ricepowered01

Posts: 200
Joined: 7/11/2005
Status: offline

i would run the ecort solo 2. http://www.escortradar.com/solo.htm it has the same performance as the escort 8500. it is cordless so you use it for the bike and car. Or you get the 8500 X50 and hard wire it to the fuse box. i do it in my car and never have problems i run it to the radio fuse. on a bike maybe use the light fuse that way when the lights are on it is on. i would go cordless

_____________________________

Ricepowered01
2006 Blue/Yellow CBR 1000 RR
2008 Silver Mazdaspeed 3
2006 Blue Toyota Tacoma X-Runner (traded in)
2005 Red/Black CBR 600 RR (traded in)
2001 Yellow Cbr 600 F4i (stolen)
1998 Lambo Turbo Civic

(in reply to FiReMiKe)

Post #: 16

RE: best radar dectector for a bike? - 1/29/2006 1:29:20 AM

QuinC

Posts: 675
Joined: 8/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricepowered01

i would run the ecort solo 2. http://www.escortradar.com/solo.htm it has the same performance as the escort 8500. it is cordless so you use it for the bike and car. Or you get the 8500 X50 and hard wire it to the fuse box. i do it in my car and never have problems i run it to the radio fuse. on a bike maybe use the light fuse that way when the lights are on it is on. i would go cordless

radar roy radarbusters.com says its the best cordless out there. however i thought this one was pretty neat BEL 946 http://www.radarbusters.com/products/beltronics/946.asp it rates a 4 out of 5... anyway its cool because it has a speaker you can put in your helmet, which is nice if you listen to music when you ride.

anyone try this out?

< Message edited by QuinC -- 1/30/2006 8:17:37 PM >

(in reply to Ricepowered01)

Post #: 17