520 conversion?Stay with stock?Gear ratio?
Login | |
|
520 conversion?Stay with stock?Gear ratio? - 2/11/2005 11:38:37 AM
|
|
|
stephen4785
Posts: 163
Joined: 12/29/2004 Status: offline
|
Im fixing to replace the chain and sprockets. I was told by a local bike shop onwer that I should go with a 520 conversion and up 4 teeth in the back which is a ratio of 3:13. I had a guy at cycle gear tell me that I should just drop 1 tooth in the front and stay with the stock size chain. Anyone have any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 520 conversion?Stay with stock?Gear ratio? - 2/11/2005 11:47:19 AM
|
|
|
sirlimpzalot
Posts: 1404
Joined: 8/24/2004 From: Roseville, CA Status: offline
|
520 Conversions are intended for racing, to save weight since the 520 chain is lighter than your stock chain..less weight on the drivetrain will equal more HP available to the back wheel....not HUGE horsepower gains, but a gain none the less ( maybe 1 HP??) The drawback to 520 chains is the life span isnt always as long as a stock ( heavier duty) chain. Make sure that ALWAYS replace both sprockets and chain at the same time, since the items wear together and if you introduce a new sprocket to a old chain, you will only be getting a fraction of the life you could have got!! As far as gearing goes; -1 is equivilent to adding 3 or 4 teeth to the rear sprocket, so eith way the end result is very similiar...one thing to think about though is that the sharper any chain "bends" ( smaller countershaft sprocket is what I am talking about here) the higher the heat ( friction) will be. So this is where lubing your chain becomes very important..and if you go up in the back you will require a longer chain that stock, and a shorter one by going smaller in the front
|
|
|
|
RE: 520 conversion?Stay with stock?Gear ratio? - 2/11/2005 5:56:55 PM
|
|
|
mkfosgate
Posts: 78
Joined: 1/23/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sirlimpzalot 520 Conversions are intended for racing, to save weight since the 520 chain is lighter than your stock chain..less weight on the drivetrain will equal more HP available to the back wheel....not HUGE horsepower gains, but a gain none the less ( maybe 1 HP??) The drawback to 520 chains is the life span isnt always as long as a stock ( heavier duty) chain. Make sure that ALWAYS replace both sprockets and chain at the same time, since the items wear together and if you introduce a new sprocket to a old chain, you will only be getting a fraction of the life you could have got!! As far as gearing goes; -1 is equivilent to adding 3 or 4 teeth to the rear sprocket, so eith way the end result is very similiar...one thing to think about though is that the sharper any chain "bends" ( smaller countershaft sprocket is what I am talking about here) the higher the heat ( friction) will be. So this is where lubing your chain becomes very important..and if you go up in the back you will require a longer chain that stock, and a shorter one by going smaller in the front If you go one down in the front, you really shouldnt have to change your chain as long as its not too worn out. Also, the heat with the front sprocket is right, BUT it is MUCH easier to change than the back sprocket.
|
|
|
|
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Advertising |
Automotive Directory |
About Us |
Archive |
Honda CBR Motorcycle Links |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© CBR Forum
CBR Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.
|