Turbo 1000RR
Login  | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 12/5/2005 8:02:09 PM
|
|
|
sirlimpzalot
Posts: 1404
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Roseville, CA
Status: offline
|
I would expect this post from no other member..You TURBO SLUT!!
So when are you gonna bling out your CBR and make it S-S-S-Stupid fast??
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 12/5/2005 8:12:36 PM
|
|
|
chainstretcher
Posts: 3853
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sirlimpzalot
I would expect this post from no other member..You TURBO SLUT!!
So when are you gonna bling out your CBR and make it S-S-S-Stupid fast??
Not me, my friend. This is just informational for whomever is interested. Had to have surgery on the right shoulder from all the torque of yee olde turbo -- not interested in having the left one done This place is saying 240+ HP. On a bike as light as the RR that's gotta be wicked
I'm waiting for feedback from the dudes. From what they've got posted I suspect this is a sub 8# setup -- probably set up at 6#. Good for short blasts up to ludicrous speed but not long distance high speed. I'll let ya know what they say.
_____________________________
It's better to burn out ...
Than high side!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 12/5/2005 8:19:46 PM
|
|
|
cjbettis
Posts: 1098
Joined: 10/29/2005
Status: offline
|
Do they have one for '05 600RR?!?!?!?!!
Just kiddin'...that is stupid HP! Chain if you get one, you probably have to update you Avatar.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 12/6/2005 7:37:17 AM
|
|
|
chainstretcher
Posts: 3853
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
|
Well they responded quickly but I wasn't real happy with the answer. He didn't address my spacer or charge cooling questions. Said they made 300 HP at 12# and made several top end runs with 17/38 gearing. Without reducing compression or cooling the intake charge I don't see how you could run at extended high speeds without melting a piston -- 12# in 1000cc's is a bunch of boost. The only other semi-safe alternative is to take out gobs of timing. But that will only work for so long.
_____________________________
It's better to burn out ...
Than high side!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 12/6/2005 10:31:31 AM
|
|
|
RSheffi649
Posts: 39
Joined: 11/6/2004
Status: offline
|
SEVERAL top end runs...on a stock 1000cc bottom end...at 12# of boost...sounds like a recipe for a bomb...
< Message edited by RSheffi649 -- 12/6/2005 10:43:47 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Turbo 1000RR - 10/4/2007 12:46:39 PM
|
|
|
MoneyHSK
Posts: 3
Joined: 10/4/2007
Status: offline
|
WOW! This is an old post! I just started working at Cycle Logic Motorsports a few months ago.
I am their CNC Machinist, we make all our own billet products and such.
Was just curious about the outcome of your conversation about the CBR 1000 Turbo Kit?
I know we are installing them on a regular basis, probably 6 since I started here. One for Roaring Toyz
Project H Bike, soon to be in the magazines.
I don't know of anyone who has been unhappy with their kit. Our bike that we used to build the kit has well
over 1000 Turbo miles on it with no problems. I know we also only run at about 7# of boost, maybe
back in 05 they tried 12#, but from everything I have been told, you need an engine rebuild to get that high.
What spacer were you addressing?
Charge cooling? You talking about an intercooler setup?
We also have a Turbo Kit for the ZX-14 that is really nice!
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
LOL Everyone always wants to go faster! Take the Maxton Mile for instance. They try to break 200 mph in 1 mile, badass! 