better mpg with 17T front sprocket??

CBR Forum Classifieds News Photo Gallery Search Member List Timeslips Contact Sponsors Register Login

better mpg with 17T front sprocket??

Printable Version

CBR Forum >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 954RR >> better mpg with 17T front sprocket??

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/18/2008 10:41:23 PM

gearhead

Posts: 40
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline

I have a 520 conversion (15/43) fitted on my 954 and have been averaging 43-46mpg. Its doing almost exactly 6000rpm at 80mph. I would like to go to a 17T front sprocket which would lower my rpm''s by almost 12%. Anyone tried this? Will it fit?? Will it make the bike lose too much punch??

Post #: 1

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/18/2008 11:16:20 PM

PlayfulGod

Posts: 3737
Joined: 6/9/2007
From: Dalton, GA
Status: offline

take off in 2nd or 3rd, thats what it will be like.

_____________________________

For All your Hosting Needs, TechyGeek.com

SBG
PC Gamer Tag: The_Plague

(in reply to gearhead)

Post #: 2

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 12:30:04 PM

gearhead

Posts: 40
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline

I don''t think it will be that drastic. For example, 1st gear/15T @10mph is 1422rpm instead of 1612.

(in reply to PlayfulGod)

Post #: 3

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 4:48:39 PM

Hcstreetriding

Posts: 984
Joined: 3/16/2008
Status: offline

good question, im interested to see if anyone has an answer from experience

(in reply to gearhead)

Post #: 4

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 4:53:39 PM

Nealio240z

Posts: 162
Joined: 5/12/2008
Status: offline

it wikll be a pig with a 17t front. Its like removing 3 from the back. I think playfulgod is right.

_____________________________

It takes many screws to build a crib, but only one to fill it...

(in reply to Hcstreetriding)

Post #: 5

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 4:55:21 PM

PlayfulGod

Posts: 3737
Joined: 6/9/2007
From: Dalton, GA
Status: offline

it will suck the life right out of why you bought a sportbike I bet on ya that.

And my bike idles at 1300-1400 lol

_____________________________

For All your Hosting Needs, TechyGeek.com

SBG
PC Gamer Tag: The_Plague

(in reply to Hcstreetriding)

Post #: 6

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 7:13:43 PM

pimpncbr954s

Posts: 602
Joined: 3/26/2007
Status: offline

Sounds like the engine would have to work harder to get going, which in turn would suck more gas.....stay low on rpms like shift no higher than 5k rpms and when traveling like 40 shift into 6th.....

(in reply to PlayfulGod)

Post #: 7

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 10:30:39 PM

gearhead

Posts: 40
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline

I guess I just don''t see this as sucking the life out of this rocket. Maybe I''m not as much of a speed demon as some of you guys. I never have enough road to open this thing up completely in first gear, maybe the steep gears would allow that. At any rate, only a $25 experiment so worth a shot.
1400rpm, 1st gear
Stock gearing 9mph
+1 gearing 10mph
-1 gearing 10mph

4000 rpm, 1st gear
stock gearing 26mph
+1 gearing 28mph
-1 gearing 25mph

4000 rpm 2nd gear
stock gearing 37mph
+1 gearing 39 mph
-1 gearing 35 mph

(in reply to pimpncbr954s)

Post #: 8

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 10:41:39 PM

PlayfulGod

Posts: 3737
Joined: 6/9/2007
From: Dalton, GA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gearhead

I guess I just don''''t see this as sucking the life out of this rocket. Maybe I''''m not as much of a speed demon as some of you guys. I never have enough road to open this thing up completely in first gear, maybe the steep gears would allow that. At any rate, only a $25 experiment so worth a shot.
1400rpm, 1st gear
Stock gearing 9mph
+1 gearing 10mph
-1 gearing 10mph

4000 rpm, 1st gear
stock gearing 26mph
+1 gearing 28mph
-1 gearing 25mph

4000 rpm 2nd gear
stock gearing 37mph
+1 gearing 39 mph
-1 gearing 35 mph

umm you just dont change out the front sprocket with out a new chain n rear sprocket with it too. And the steep gears will kill the bottom end which is bad enough stock. And @6000rpm you barely even touched the power band.

_____________________________

For All your Hosting Needs, TechyGeek.com

SBG
PC Gamer Tag: The_Plague

(in reply to gearhead)

Post #: 9

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/19/2008 10:42:04 PM

Nealio240z

Posts: 162
Joined: 5/12/2008
Status: offline

Give it a try, but it could become more costly in the long run... First. it WILL take off like an electric wheelechair. second, it will be alot harder on the engine and especially the clutch. Have you priced a clutch lately? Did you think that the rpm could be so low that you could be lugging your motor, this causes more stress on internal components, not to mention the constant shifting. These bikes are ment to run within a certain rpm when cruising, this keeps oil pressure up and heat down. And why would you need more than 43-46 mpg? This is a sport bike... You want miles per gallon- get a honda 90. imo...

_____________________________

It takes many screws to build a crib, but only one to fill it...

(in reply to gearhead)

Post #: 10

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/20/2008 10:01:04 PM

NastyNINA54

Posts: 56
Joined: 4/14/2008
Status: offline

hahahaha! not tryin to be an asshole but who really worries that much about gas mileage on a sportbike? damn gas prices must be bad.

_____________________________

WHATS SO GOOD ABOUT SUZUKI?

(in reply to Nealio240z)

Post #: 11

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/20/2008 11:58:19 PM

Nealio240z

Posts: 162
Joined: 5/12/2008
Status: offline

lol, i second that. !!!!!

_____________________________

It takes many screws to build a crib, but only one to fill it...

(in reply to NastyNINA54)

Post #: 12

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/21/2008 7:20:36 AM

pimpncbr954s

Posts: 602
Joined: 3/26/2007
Status: offline

1. Fill up the Mazda 6?
2. Fill up the Chevy Caprice?
3. Fill up the 954??

I CHOSE NUMBER THREE WITHOUT NO THOUGHT!!!!

(in reply to Nealio240z)

Post #: 13

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/21/2008 10:14:50 AM

Hcstreetriding

Posts: 984
Joined: 3/16/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NastyNINA54

hahahaha! not tryin to be an asshole but who really worries that much about gas mileage on a sportbike? damn gas prices must be bad.

Im right there with you. If im going out riding i plan on spending $40 in gas at least. and if its going to cost me more because im ripping on it every chance i get, i dont think twice, i just do it and pay for it. You work a shitty job to make money so that you can spend money doing something that you enjoy. just enjoy the ride, regardless of how much weight your wallet is losing.

(in reply to NastyNINA54)

Post #: 14

RE: better mpg with 17T front sprocket?? - 6/21/2008 1:07:01 PM

NastyNINA54

Posts: 56
Joined: 4/14/2008
Status: offline

it comes down to the saying " U GOTTA PAY TO PLAY"... and thats y i live pacheck to paycheck. cant stop playin with the 54 and those damn booty shakers.

_____________________________

WHATS SO GOOD ABOUT SUZUKI?

(in reply to Hcstreetriding)

Post #: 15