CBR Forum   Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Search   Member List   Timeslips   Contact   Sponsors   Register   Login  

rear tire size

  Printable Version
CBR Forum >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 1000F "Hurricane" >> rear tire size Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
rear tire size - 6/23/2008 9:13:46 PM   
SoloRider

 

Posts: 30
Joined: 3/13/2008
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Status: offline
It''s almost time for new tires it came to me with the rear squared off a little and cupping on the front. I''m thinking of trying the Pilot Road 2 since I liked the 2CT on my last bike. The rear tire is a 170. Any thought on 170 vs 180?
Post #: 1
RE: rear tire size - 6/23/2008 9:27:37 PM   
Shadow



Posts: 3644
Joined: 12/21/2007
From: Pinetown, South Africa
Status: offline
Shadow's photo gallery
Good choice - go 180 max 

(in reply to SoloRider)
Post #: 2
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 6:34:41 PM   
HARDCORP 8654


Posts: 1427
Joined: 4/23/2007
Status: offline
HARDCORP 8654's photo gallery
Don''''t know exactly what your model you have. The late models can run a 190 I am running in the Continental Road attacks and now have approximately 1300 miles on it. It handles better than anything I have previously used including the Michelin just one man''''s opinion


and here''s one of many previous threads on the subject
http://www.cbrforum.com/m_423199/tm.htm

< Message edited by HARDCORP 8654 -- 6/24/2008 6:45:21 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Shadow)
Post #: 3
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 8:13:25 PM   
kevin_stevens

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 6/8/2008
Status: offline
God, you can''t even *see* the rim! How wide is the wheel you have that 190 on?!

KeS

(in reply to HARDCORP 8654)
Post #: 4
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 8:31:01 PM   
Shadow



Posts: 3644
Joined: 12/21/2007
From: Pinetown, South Africa
Status: offline
Shadow's photo gallery
Solo''s on a 93 model, so the clearance isn''t an issue.
We''ve had this debate before, and I''d still go to 180 maximum on the rear, and the Michelin Road 2 does a good job for me - as good as the Bridgestone BT020, maybe better.
Others, like HC (Hi Gunny) have successfully gone to the 190, but the general consensus is it affects the handling negatively when you go that wide.
Here''s my Michelin with 5000 miles up - still running well



Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

(in reply to HARDCORP 8654)
Post #: 5
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 8:38:49 PM   
kevin_stevens

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 6/8/2008
Status: offline
I guess it''s just hard to see the profile from that angle. (shrug) I like the RoadAttack 190 on my ZX-14, but that''s a 6" rim.

KeS

(in reply to Shadow)
Post #: 6
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 9:22:48 PM   
Shadow



Posts: 3644
Joined: 12/21/2007
From: Pinetown, South Africa
Status: offline
Shadow's photo gallery
Better ? Profile is 55
The Conti''s a good tyre too -



Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

(in reply to kevin_stevens)
Post #: 7
RE: rear tire size - 6/24/2008 10:01:19 PM   
kevin_stevens

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 6/8/2008
Status: offline
Yup! They work pretty well at the track, too:




Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

(in reply to Shadow)
Post #: 8
RE: rear tire size - 6/25/2008 9:25:19 AM   
TimBucTwo


Posts: 608
Joined: 6/13/2006
From: Upstate NY, USA
Status: offline
I have switched form the 170 to the 180 and so far I like the 180.
Hard to get a good comparison due to this crapy weather we have here.  Every day rain, rain all this week again and next week. I have only ridden in rain this year. I can’t find a dry patch of asphalt to test the new tires on.  I do notice that I can lean the bike further in wet conditions now but, I don’t know if it is because the tires are new.

(in reply to kevin_stevens)
Post #: 9
RE: rear tire size - 6/25/2008 12:16:17 PM   
Noe


Posts: 321
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Bramming, Denmark, Scandinavia
Status: offline
I also use Michelin Pilot Road 2 on my rear right now, but I’m sticking to a 170. I think the bike gets a bit heavier in the steering, and I like to get the old girl as light on her toes as possible. She is heavy enough as she comes J

_____________________________

Remeber this:
"4 wheels move the body,2 WHEELS MOVE THE SOUL!!!"


(in reply to TimBucTwo)
Post #: 10
RE: rear tire size - 6/25/2008 4:32:16 PM   
SoloRider

 

Posts: 30
Joined: 3/13/2008
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Status: offline
I was wondering if the wider tire would slow steering much. Maybe I''ll just go with whatever''s in stock and see how it goes

Track? I''m signed up for a Buell track day/demo at Sears Point in November and I plan on taking the CBR. I haven''t pushed the bike really hard yet but I''m getting used to the linked brakes. I read the posts on de-linking before I got the bike, just in case I can''t take the nose dive on rear braking.



(in reply to Noe)
Post #: 11
RE: rear tire size - 6/26/2008 6:31:26 AM   
Coopz


Posts: 245
Joined: 10/22/2006
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline
Coopz's photo gallery
I use a 170 just make the handling a bit lighter, I don''t ride hard enough to warent that fraction more grip a 180 provides.

(in reply to SoloRider)
Post #: 12
RE: rear tire size - 6/26/2008 12:17:36 PM   
Bassman


Posts: 72
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: Hamden, CT USA
Status: offline
I''m in the 180/55 camp.  Yes, it does slow the steering , but it eliminates the annoying slight head shake at 45-55 mph.

_____________________________

Bassman
''93 CBR 1000F
''89 GB 500
''83 XR 350R
''76 CB 400F

(in reply to Coopz)
Post #: 13
RE: rear tire size - 6/30/2008 4:52:32 AM   
boink1079


Posts: 47
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Port Kennedy Western Australia
Status: offline
boink1079's photo gallery
I''m in Australia and I use the Michelin 180/55 sports.  Great tyre - wehave great weather and good roads - the 180 is beautiful - lean the cane as far as your knee will allow.

(in reply to Bassman)
Post #: 14
RE: rear tire size - 6/30/2008 5:56:31 AM   
TimBucTwo


Posts: 608
Joined: 6/13/2006
From: Upstate NY, USA
Status: offline

Bassman, I developed that head shake after I installed a GIVI bag system. Even with just the top bag I get the shake from 45-55. You are correct about the 180; it takes most of it away.

Unlike others, I don’t notice heavier steering with the 180, that may be due to the fact that I was coming off of a worn front tire also. I still have not fully tested the new 180 out in normal ridding conditions as it has been raining here for two months. The long range forecast is 7 more days of rain. There were a couple of days that were very hot after some rain where the roads were damp. On those days I could get a great bit of lean angle. The bike feels more stable with the 180 than it did with the 170. I still slide in turns and will stay with the 180.  

(in reply to boink1079)
Post #: 15
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
CBR >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
Jump to:

Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
voodoochyl7171
doncollins6257
tahoe sc5874
rrasco5615
pitsvtec5323
d2vw14_205099
tk954rr4914
vpsophmore4727
blue fox4575
chainstretch4560

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

CBR Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.