ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!!

CBR Forum Classifieds News Photo Gallery Search Member List Timeslips Contact Sponsors Register Login

ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!!

Printable Version

CBR >> Past CBR Models >> CBR 1000F "Hurricane" >> ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!!

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!! - 6/27/2008 5:24:27 PM

95caneboy

Posts: 14
Joined: 5/29/2008
Status: offline

hey all i need is the rotor now and she will be driveable, will 88 cane rotors work on a 95, quick replies greatly appreciated

thanks
Andrew

Post #: 1

RE: ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!! - 6/27/2008 6:36:55 PM

pacojoseph

Posts: 431
Joined: 5/10/2007
From: Philly, PA USA
Status: offline

See my response to the post entitled "brakes on my 88". The simple answer seems to be, yes- to front, no- to rear.

(in reply to 95caneboy)

Post #: 2

RE: ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!! - 6/29/2008 8:01:19 AM

Mr Self Destruct

Posts: 31
Joined: 5/31/2007
Status: offline

I have a 95 rear rim on my ''88 and the 88 rotor bolted on fine, so I don''t see a problem.

_____________________________

http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/bmacph/hurricane/hurindex.htm

(in reply to pacojoseph)

Post #: 3

RE: ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!! - 6/29/2008 10:59:47 AM

pacojoseph

Posts: 431
Joined: 5/10/2007
From: Philly, PA USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr Self Destruct

I have a 95 rear rim on my ''''88 and the 88 rotor bolted on fine, so I don''''t see a problem.

Are you using a 95 caliper or an 88 caliper with the rear rim. It makes a difference. Discs come in different thicknesses, and using too thick a rotor will mean you''ll never be able to install new pads and too thin of a rotor and you''ll lose a significant amount of stopping power.

(in reply to Mr Self Destruct)

Post #: 4

RE: ALMOST THERE WILL THIS WORK!! - 7/1/2008 6:36:34 AM

Mr Self Destruct

Posts: 31
Joined: 5/31/2007
Status: offline

I used the 88 caliper.

_____________________________

http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/bmacph/hurricane/hurindex.htm

(in reply to pacojoseph)

Post #: 5