CBR Forum   Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Search   Member List   Timeslips   Contact   Sponsors   Register   Login  

Repsol v. RC-51

  Printable Version
CBR >> Current Honda CBR Models >> CBR 1000RR >> Repsol v. RC-51 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/26/2005 8:43:43 AM   
mcbinns

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 3/26/2005
Status: offline
first off, howdy this is my first post :)

second off. I'm stuck in my decision to go RC-51 or the sexy Repsol for my new bike. the RC is what i have been desiring for a logn time, but now the repsol has caught my eye. I have a feelgin you guys will point me to the repsol but i was just curious if anyoen has had experience with both who can give their opinion
thnx
Post #: 1
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/26/2005 10:47:32 AM   
sirlimpzalot


Posts: 1404
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: Roseville, CA
Status: offline
sirlimpzalot's photo gallery
The problem with the RC51 is that it only runs on two cylinders!!
Seriously though, I have ridden the RC and I dont get it. It seems nice but is a little heavy and riding a twin is ALOT different than a inline four, at least it has a decent aftermarket support. So if you need anything for a RC there are options...I guess it comes down to your preference really

(in reply to mcbinns)
Post #: 2
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/26/2005 2:42:58 PM   
L8X


Posts: 1909
Joined: 12/19/2004
Status: offline
L8X's photo gallery
i dont know if you can really compare the two. But my advice is to get what you want, not what you think other people think is cooler. i mean it comes down to who's rding the thing. Dont be a poser, be a rider.

_____________________________

www.LexRacing.com

(in reply to sirlimpzalot)
Post #: 3
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/26/2005 9:19:42 PM   
reevesna

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I too had my eye on an RC51 for quite some time and also looked at the SV1000...but when it comes down to it i've never ridin a v-twin before and they're just not the kind of power you'd think...its up to the rider like they say...but know what your getting yourself into...both bikes are amazing in their own respects

_____________________________

'03 954RR titanium/black carbon; devil highmount, front & rear fenders, short stalk front & flush mount rear signals, cas cap, powder coated flat black; swingarm, pegs & rearsets, PC3r, K&N filter, ect ect

(in reply to L8X)
Post #: 4
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/26/2005 10:55:21 PM   
chainstretcher



Posts: 4491
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: online
chainstretcher's photo gallery
I love the RC-51. Awesome bike. I ended up with the 1000RR only because it really fit me. The RC felt odd where the CBR felt like a comfy glove.

The guys above already gave you the best advice -- get what you like. With the choice between an RC-51 and a CBR1000RR you really can't go wrong.

_____________________________

It's better to burn out ...
Than high side!

(in reply to reevesna)
Post #: 5
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/29/2005 11:19:40 AM   
QuikSilver


Posts: 152
Joined: 9/1/2004
Status: offline
QuikSilver's photo gallery
I would take the sound of an RC-51 over a CBR any day. Music to my ears. But like everyone else said, its up to you. The RC-51 will take a little while to get used to but it can be an awesome bike, on or off the track.

_____________________________

2004 CBR 1000rr
2004 Suzuki GSXR 600 (Track Bike and in pieces)
2006 Aprilia SXV 550 (Coming Spring 2006)

I would rather sweat than bleed...

(in reply to chainstretcher)
Post #: 6
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/29/2005 2:40:55 PM   
guyomatic


Posts: 137
Joined: 3/29/2005
Status: offline
I too am in love with the sound of the V-twin. I also love the torque. But look at it this way. This is the last year for the RC, there will be no more advances or anything with the bike. The CBR on the other hand, it's only the beginning. There is soooo much technology in the new CBR. I've ridden both and the CBR is much more comfortable. The RC feels like I'm riding on the tank and it's feels pudgy. It's a awesome bike, but for the long hual, I chose the CBR. Good luck!!!
R.

(in reply to QuikSilver)
Post #: 7
RE: Repsol v. RC-51 - 3/29/2005 9:01:05 PM   
dssides1

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 3/19/2005
From: Muscatine,Iowa
Status: offline
dssides1's photo gallery
I had the 2002 RC and put about 4000 miles on it in 3months, it's an awesome bike if you like the v-twin, I just got a new 2004 CBR 1000rr about three weeks ago and I'd have to say I like it a little bit better, as far as handling, to me they are pretty comparible.

(in reply to guyomatic)
Post #: 8
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
CBR Forums >> Current Honda CBR Models >> CBR 1000RR
Jump to:

Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
voodoochyl7118
doncollins6248
tahoe sc5874
rrasco5574
pitsvtec5323
d2vw14_205048
tk954rr4687
vpsophmore4664
blue fox4570
havoc4495

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

CBR Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Honda Motor Company.