180 vs 190 rear
Login | |
|
180 vs 190 rear - 10/1/2008 1:27:50 AM
|
|
|
ag1s
Posts: 9
Joined: 8/4/2008 Status: offline
|
Hi all, I just noticed that the 954 I bought a month ago has a 180 rear as opposed to the 190 recommended by the manual. Tyre is still healthy (Bridgestone 002) so I''m not thinking to replace it just now. Just wondering though if a 190 section suits it better. True or false? Next tyre will be the BT 016 tripple compound by the looks of what i have read so far. Also I have read in various posts here about the chain mod (to a 520 I think) , but I couldnt find any info on the reason for such a mod. So...Why??? agis
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 180 vs 190 rear - 10/1/2008 9:23:07 AM
|
|
|
TK954RR
Posts: 4902
Joined: 12/3/2006 From: Green Bay WI Status: online
|
Either tire will work just fine, a lot of people go to the 180 tire for a little better turn in, ie: leans over easier. As far as the 520 chain conversion, its a lighter, thinner chain, so it has a little less rotating mass. In theory it should free up a little bit of hp, but not so much you will probably notice, it also of course a bit lighter also.
_____________________________
Haven''t you ever heard the phrase *The customer is always right?* Let me fill you in on a little secret, okay. THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS AN ASSHOLE!
|
|
|
|
RE: 180 vs 190 rear - 10/1/2008 10:54:45 AM
|
|
|
Hcstreetriding
Posts: 994
Joined: 3/16/2008 Status: offline
|
Im riding a 180 tire and a 520 chain conversion. Personally i think i liked my 190 better but it could just be that im still getting used to riding twisties. didint notice any change from the chain, cept it looks really small. i actually like the stock chain better too just for looks But thats just IMO. Take it as you will.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|