RE: CBR 929 CAMS?
Login  | |
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/12/2006 2:45:31 PM
|
|
|
QuinC
Posts: 675
Joined: 8/19/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: speedy
Also if you go to www.erionracing.com they sell engine parts from there 929s some used and some old/ new stock from there race bikes . If u grab up that stuff im sure u will have one seriously insane 929 .
awsome link! has everything you would need. also about 10x more expensive then rebuilding a car engine :(
_____________________________
2000 cbr 929
gpr stabalizer
d&d slip.
zg d.b windscreen
rear hugger
radar detector
autocom system/helmet speakers
H.I.D low beam H7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/13/2006 10:13:41 AM
|
|
|
929 DOUBLE ARE
Posts: 31
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
|
hahaha yeah its not cheap but if u wanna be faster then the other guy u have to pay to play , but if u think about it the bikes that stuff came from was worth about $200,000 so really ur getting a good deal, lol i know a guy selling volocity stacks , aluminum brand new that are exact copies of erions for about 250 a set , good deal considering erion used ones are 400,
anyway if u run into money (alot) and decide u wanna fix her up thats the place to call
_____________________________
now that i ride a sportbike gurls will want me :)
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/13/2006 10:15:04 AM
|
|
|
speedy
Posts: 86
Joined: 10/9/2005
Status: offline
|
.
< Message edited by speedy -- 3/13/2006 10:16:04 AM >
_____________________________
riding is an addiction and im glad to say im an addict.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/16/2006 1:53:58 PM
|
|
|
ericmxzx440
Posts: 24
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Can you use the stock link chain with 45 rear and 15 front??? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/16/2006 6:16:04 PM
|
|
|
sixs929
Posts: 322
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
|
Hey, ericmxzx440.
I can only tell you my experience, which I posted some weeks ago in answer to another question -
I got my 929 with stock 15 front and a Spocket Specialists 48 rear. According to my manual, 42 is stock rear, but I read somewhere prior to getting the manual that stock was 41 rear. So I ordered a 41 rear from Spocket Specialists.( I guarantee some of you are already laughing...)
That's when I realized - when you shorten a chain, you have to shorten it by at least two "teeth", so to speak. So you can go from 48 to 46 or 44 or 42, and so forth and just shorten the chain by a link ( two teeth ) at a time, and not have to adjust the rear axle, and keep it in the "good zone". In my case, I had to compensate for the "Odd" rear number of teeth by either moving the axle forward to where the tire almost touched the swingarm, or rearward (which I did) to where the wear indicator is just at the aft limit ( indicating a worn chain, even though it isn't worn).
If you can picture this, if I were to go to a 16 front with the 41 rear, it would pull the axel forward again and the wear indicator would be where it belongs.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/16/2006 10:15:52 PM
|
|
|
sixs929
Posts: 322
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
|
PS - should add, I can't get ANY TWO SOURCES to agree what stock gearing is. My last post is nothing more than a shot at explaining what can happen when you switch fron an even-number sprocket to an odd, and visa versa.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/17/2006 12:43:26 PM
|
|
|
matt365
Posts: 141
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
|
16/43 or 16/42
I think it may depend on year, or manufacture date.
One tooth is going to make very little difference.
if you figure stock speedo is off by approx. 5% high, then putting a 42 tooth on the rear would probably correct most of the error.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/17/2006 11:31:03 PM
|
|
|
clean929
Posts: 349
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
|
stock it 16/43.
i got a 520 quick kit from sprocketcenter.com for a good deal. gettin that put on tomorrow.
I called the FACTORYPRO autherized tun eshop today and to get my web cams and dyno tuned with Digital 4 Gas exhaust analyzer
for about $650. the guy said the cams alone should get about 7-10 hp, and with the right tunning prolly 10-15 hp.. some where around there .as soon as i get the funds and get it done i will post my base line and tuned dyno sheets. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/18/2006 3:20:11 AM
|
|
|
QuinC
Posts: 675
Joined: 8/19/2005
Status: offline
|
if your going to put cams in you might as well put some other stuff in there too. 
_____________________________
2000 cbr 929
gpr stabalizer
d&d slip.
zg d.b windscreen
rear hugger
radar detector
autocom system/helmet speakers
H.I.D low beam H7
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/18/2006 10:50:01 PM
|
|
|
matt365
Posts: 141
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
|
Yeah man, if it is coming apart anyways, get some top end work done. Porting & polish job would be a good idea. You know, for the cost, you could throw on a small turbo & leave the cams alone.
http://www.rrzone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1583
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/18/2006 10:56:28 PM
|
|
|
clean929
Posts: 349
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
|
DID SOME SAY TURBO!!? WHERE AND HOW MUCH? IS IT A COMPLETE KIT B/C I was looking around a the kit run around $2500/
i would like to ge the head done up but i fig. if i keep the bike i will just find a motor and start fresh. i'm just testing the waters. i've built my 91 civc hatch and the came out pretty good. ant thart took me a better part of 3 years to do. ima take it as a learning proccess..
but bqck to the turbo..... it if any one can share some info on the whole turbo thing i may just do that and try to fly to the moon... j/k..
THANKS TO ALL WHO HAS PUT THEIR 2CENTS IN THE FEEDBACK HAS BEEN A BIG HELP..!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CBR 929 CAMS? - 3/18/2006 11:24:18 PM
|
|
|
matt365
Posts: 141
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
|
Start off reading that post on www.rrzone.com
Mr. Turbo kits are real expensive, like 3 grand expensive...
Getting a smaller ball bearing turbo, and rigging up an intercooler could be done for much less if you have the skills. It might be a little easier on the older 900's, I could see alot of dyno time in your future if you attempted this, custom mapping would be a must. From what I've read, a smaller turbo is better. You could get 30-40hp without stressing out the engine too much.
Thumbnail Image
Thumbnail Image
Thumbnail Image
Thumbnail Image
Thumbnail Image
 Attachment (5)
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
